| | Department Issues | Signed Off | Intl |
|
|
1. The wind design in the Code Analysis lists ICC-600, please submit the required checklist.
|
12/15/2015
| jdacosta |
|
|
2. Information on drawings and detail conflicting and confusing. Information must be correlated which includes but not limited to;
a, Threaded rod layout, wall sections and notes.
b, Roof and wall sheathing thickness'.
|
12/15/2015
| jdacosta |
|
|
3. Shearwall detail indicates HTT16 typical and 2-2x4 at each end. Please show location of all shearwall sections and HTT16 locations. Clarify when HTT16 conflicts with threaded rods.
|
12/15/2015
| jdacosta |
|
|
4. Please identify the open porch ceiling cover which protects the enclosed attic.
|
12/15/2015
| jdacosta |
|
|
5. There appears to be missing interior bearing footers.
ADDED ON 12/15/2015; Item not addressed. Please refer to Roof Truss A-10 bearing on interior wall at Exercise room/Bedroom #3.
|
| |
|
|
6. It appears Roof Truss A-09 is a 3 point bearing truss whereas there doesn't appear to be a bearing wall or beam across the Foyer/Entry. Please review and revise as necessary.
ADDED ON 12/15/2015; Item not addressed. Please refer to Roof Truss A-09. There are 7 total. The first one properly bears, midpoint, on the 1/2 bath wall and the remainder span across the Entry/Foyer unsupported. Please review and revise.
|
| |
|
|
7. Drawings indicate 2x4 exterior walls whereas the Florida Energy Form indicates R19 insulation. Please review and revise.
|
12/15/2015
| jdacosta |
|
|
8. Effective July 1, 2008 St. Johns County will be required to enforce the installation of Carbon Monoxide Detectors in all new construction as per Rule No. 9B-3.0472, Florida Administrative Rule. Please identify on plans the locations of all Carbon Monoxide Detectors installed according to code listed above.
|
12/15/2015
| jdacosta |
|
|
9. An additional fee due and payable at permitting shall be of $100 each for any second resubmission of plans. Per FL. Statute 553.80(2)(b), on any third and subsequent resubmissions that do not correct a code violation that is specifically and continuously noted in each previous rejection, a fee of four times the amount of the fee attributed to plan review will be charged.
|
| |
|
|
10. General Notes: Your re-submittal shall include two complete sets of plans. Please insert the revised pages into the plan sets, and pages removed from the stamped "Job copy" set, shall be marked as "old set" and shall be included in the re-submittal.
If old "Job copy" drawings, are not resubmitted there will be additional plan review fee charged due to the amount of time necessary to review entire drawing again.
ALL ITEMS changed or revised on plans and documents shall be identified by circling, clouding or identified by some other legible method. ADDITIONAL ITEMS MAY BE REQUIRED - DEPENDING ON INFORMATION AND CLARITY OF FINAL PLANS SUBMITTED FOR REVIEW.
|
| |
|
|
11. Pen and ink changes, white-outs, or any such altering of raised seal engineering drawings, is not permitted under state laws governing the practice of Architecture or Engineering. All information on the raised seal drawings must part of the printed sheets at the time the drawings are sealed by the Architect/Engineer.
|
| |