RESUBMITTING: Please make necessary changes and resubmit the complete permit application package. Response to comments / plans / specifications should be submitted to the Permit Center as a resubmission for the original project unless other arrangements are made with the Fire Plan Reviewer or the Fire Plan Review Supervisor.

To help speed the review process you should include a written response to comments summary to clarify and/or illustrate corrections on plans (bubbling, highlighting, or notations are best). Please use the Florida Fire Prevention Code 6th Ed. for all code reference in a response to comments. You are required to remove old pages and reinsert the new pages.

The numbered items require a response or plans to be updated to complete the review.

2) The code summary  and classification of occupancy information was based strictly on the Florida Building Code References.  Include the Florida Fire Prevention Code information in the code summary as well. 

4) INFORMATIONAL ONLY NO RESPONSE NECESSARY:
The system(s) outlined in this set of plans is conceptual.

A HOLD has been placed at insulation inspection (109) until either: a) a permit has been pulled or b) a letter submitted from respective system contractor indicating no work to be done to the existing system:
- BDA Radio Communications Test
- fire alarm system
- fire sprinkler system
- fire underground
- kitchen hood
- kitchen suppression system
- Fire/smoke damper inspections
- Generator
- Emergency light revision

6) Identify Hardware Groups for each door on the door schedule.  Also provide the door hardware information within the 087100 specifications. 

-------

Hardware column added to door schedule.  087100 information provided but does not indicate hardware rating.   Please note that the following hardware sets are indicated for rated doors.  Ensure that the rated version of the hardware is purchased and installed.  Maintain the supporting documentation indicating this on site for the inspector upon request. 

Rated hardware sets are: 3,4,6,9,10,12,13,14,T1,19.    

8) Door 1006B appears to be a pocket door that is indicated to have a rating.  Provide specification sheets for this door. 

-------------

Door has been changed to a side hinged rated door.  PJW Friday, January 08, 2021

10) CaptiveAire plans have been provided in this plan set, sheets M-611, and M-612.  For these plans to be approved, one of the following must take place:

• Submit the hood application, all necessary plans, specifications etc. for our office to conduct a full hood review for permit. 
• Remove the hood sheets from the plan package. 
• If the sheets are needed for purposes of mechanical balance calculations etc., add a note to the sheets indicating that the hood plans will be submitted later as a deferred submittal. 

-----------------------

Note added to the sheets indicating deferred submittal.  PJW Friday, January 08, 2021

12) Memory Garden Gate

Provide the calculations for occupant load of the memory garden and the number of occupants that utilize the memory garden for egress from the building.  Is a single gate sufficient?

-----------

2 40" gates were added from this area.  PJW Friday, January 08, 2021

14) There is a good bit of furniture indicated in the common areas of the building such as lounge 1210, Dining 1201, Dining 1101 etc.  A 36" egress path is required per NFPA 101:7.3.4.1, or more if required by the occupant load.  Identify the clear path on the plans. 

-------

The egress path has been indicated on sheet G-201. PJW Friday, January 08, 2021 

16) Do not see where cooking oil (new and/or used) will be stored. If inside the building, show compliance with 1:66.19.7. If outside the building, indicate tank size (in gallons) and be prepared to submit for tank permit if over 60 gallons. Permit will need to show compliance with NFPA 1 Chapter 66 (1:66.9.19, 1:66.21) for a combustible IIIB liquid.

--------------

No more than 60 gallons will be stored on site.  See RTC and letter from owner scanned into the system.  PJW Friday, January 08, 2021

18) In Building Radio Enhancement System

This building is more than 10,000 square feet or, two or more stories in height requiring a third party contractor to conduct a two-way radio communication test in accordance with NFPA 1:11.10 and NFPA 72 (2013 Edition)  by the time of the 105 framing inspection.

NOTE: A copy of this report must be provided and submitted to our office as a revision before the 105 framing inspection.  A 105 Framing Hold has been placed until receipt of the revision.

Should the third party contractor’s two-way radio communication test pass at the framing stage, a copy of the third party testing documentation will need to be submitted for review. Once the documentation has been received, the 105 framing hold will be removed.

OR,

Should the third party paperwork indicate that the test is not satisfactory, the contractor will then have to submit a building permit revision. The revision will need to include: the unsatisfactory test paperwork, outline of corrective measures, and plans to illustrate the corrective measures to meet requirements provided by the design professional.

If the building is required to have an In Building Radio Enhancement System, at the Fire Final you will be required to provide the Fire Inspector the third party contractor’s satisfactory testing documentation following the installation and testing of the In Building Radio Enhancement System. A hold will be placed for this documentation at the building permit fire final.

------------------------

The note was added to G-201 on the plans.  RTC indicates that if required through testing the system would be provided.  Also the telcom room was revised to add the 2 hour rated walls and the UL P571 ceiling indicated on A-400 and A-450 in preparation for the system.  PJW Friday, January 08, 2021